In the corporate sphere , there are events of professional negligence that are overlooked, and then there are stories that shake the foundations of integrity . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , is a perfect example of the latter — a story of suspected unethical behavior that severely undermines the reputation of a specific individual but brings scrutiny over the organization’s values .
In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has remained in his role , appearing untouched by the turmoil enveloping him . How has this been enabled to go on ? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? From what insiders reveal , Collins’ history of questionable behavior started with violations of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it intensified into a series of ethical breaches that has left fellow employees demoralized and partners bewildered .
Amid a management development session — intended to foster better management—David Collins allegedly transformed what should have been a growth-oriented experience into a chain of irresponsible incidents . Sources claim he spent company-sponsored junkets attempting to seduce female colleagues , a glaring violation of Ventia’s shared values , all while his family remained uninformed .
But the misconduct didn’t stop at personal entanglements . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to share suggestive pictures to women—a gross misappropriation read more of professional tools and a violation of confidentiality . His brazen use of Microsoft dave collins kerikeri Teams to distribute risqué communications—including symbols celebrating indiscretions— creates a portrait of a man apathetic to the fallout. Following these digital flirtations , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in sexual interactions with an employee on several instances during company hours , despite his being married and her having a committed relationship . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources shattered workplace protocols but destroyed families — leaving a path of mistrust that extended outside of the organizational context.
Why can this behavior be permitted to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly shattered all norms is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The explanation , it appears, originates in a worrisome failure of governance within the business. Issues have been raised , yet Collins operates without restraint .
This deficiency of accountability conveys a risky precedent : that rank and influence within the enterprise can guard against punishment . It creates a toxic work environment , discourages team members, and ultimately damages the firm’s reputation .